North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast'sActions
- From: Christopher Morrow
- Date: Mon Nov 29 22:22:47 2010
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org> wrote:
> No one will ever be in ratio compliance with an eyeball dominant
> network. Ever. Period. It's not possible via technology and
> TOS. Enforcing it as an eyeball network just forces content providers
> to aquire eyeballs, e.g. compete with you. That's bad business.
see craig's report from nanog47:
<http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog47/presentations/Monday/Labovitz_ObserveReport_N47_Mon.pdf>
not for a time has Comcast been solely an 'eye-ball' network... or so
they think.
-chris
(I don't disagree with leo's stance, though I'm not a peering person
so I really try never to know how all of that magic works)
|
