North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: Outages mailing list
- From: Alexander Harrowell
- Date: Fri Sep 29 10:57:52 2006
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=LT6mHxbQNFVLHkP3x7t6Ej7rwoHblgpOXNFHIoJa/ZXsm0dCN6gKt6mhdqQTDnygWQMO8ddvx2KNwBLfr22lsVxghY4aIi/k3RYuwhc6dqbOptHKtCBw2HjwMr92ZRuTPysVX6KvMNcr7q0HADRuDLHvhxyZz8zm68Lmmz1szjU=
Presumably, if you find you can't reach the outages list because their
listserv has had an outage, you just come up on NANOG like before?
On 9/29/06, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 01:32:35 +0200, Niels Bakker said:
> Gadi's tactics in a nutshell:
>
> 1) develop a long-term habit of posting off-topic stuff to nanog
> 2) get called on it repeatedly
OK, for the purposes of this discussion, we'll postulate that in fact,
the posting was indeed off-topic...
> 3) challenge what's supposed to be "on-topic" for the mailing list anyway
> 4) start a new mailing list in an attempt to take real content away from nanog
But if he takes the supposedly off-topic stuff away, what "real" content
is he taking away? You can't have it both ways. If it's sufficiently
"real" that you're concerned about it being taken to a different list,
you shouldn't have labelled it off-topic earlier.
> Don't fall for it, people.
Don't fall for what?
|
