North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: [routing-wg]BGP Update Report
- From: Vince Fuller
- Date: Mon Sep 11 13:54:32 2006
- Authentication-results: sj-dkim-8.cisco.com; header.From=vaf@cisco.com; dkim=pass (sig from cisco.com verified; );
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=1056; t=1157996055; x=1158860055;c=relaxed/relaxed; s=sjdkim8002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version;d=cisco.com; i=vaf@cisco.com; z=From:Vince=20Fuller=20<vaf@cisco.com>|Subject:Re=3A=20[routing-wg]BGP=20Update=20Report;X=v=3Dcisco.com=3B=20h=3DbhiZNs0Lj4Ym/Acj+Op+qA2U/b0=3D; b=K/jo6RPbXmjUysDAV1BrYxPS85G2H6UTN02BxvTouP5z6dMl/DB8xg6hs6saf1J9hRmc61V2V3oCmXjmG5ilEDFuBgV0PImtT23UgeJMzG8z5AMNnsci+avENRCHWHu0;
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 10:28:49AM -0700, Vince Fuller wrote:
> > One might also imagine that more globally-friendly way to implement this
> > would have been to build a network (VPN would be adequate) between the
> > ground stations and assign each plane a prefix out of a block whose subnets
> > are only dynamically advertsed within that network/VPN. Doing that would
> > prevent the rest of the global Internet from having to track 1000+ routing
> > changes per prefix per day as satellite handoffs are performed.
>
> As has been said before, and is also readable in that blog entry: the
> system is supposed to create *one* advertisement change when the plane
> is crossing from the "Europe" to the "US" ground station (etc.), not
> 1000+.
The comment still applies. Imagine that this system were implemented globally
on all international/intercontinental air routes. It would still be nice to
avoid having each of those airplanes cause a globally-visible routing update
whenever it crosses some geographical boundary.
--Vince
|
