North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: So -- what did happen to Panix?
- From: Michael.Dillon
- Date: Mon Jan 30 04:53:37 2006
> >Perhaps people should stop trying to have these
> >operational discussions in the IETF and take the
> >discussions to NANOG where network operators gather.
> We have tried, of course; see, for example, NANOG 28 (Salt Lake City).
> There was no more consensus at NANOG than in the IETF...
One attempt almost 3 years ago, doesn't sound very
serious to me. And if the discussion is only concerned
with seeking consensus on implementing a new flavor
of BGP protocol then it isn't much of a discussion.
In fact, there was a consensus at Salt Lake City that
the issues of routing security could be adequately dealt
with by existing tools and protocols. Not all problems
require new protocols to solve them.