
|
North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: BGP terminology question
- From: NetSecGuy
- Date: Sun Nov 06 14:22:06 2005
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=DWPf9JDs+qvLMTWR4S6ahu9/qXrI/aTysOpqjVx9kIUu42e/JWr9n6SQSx9161iAqNO3DsyawTKf9ac/AwAelFjP/7DK0SM2sJItTI6ROHEAEO5X1E0xARIz2x8i1zrYYujE6vfVKsatgWlq3jJZW1FUD4vhUqfRlh0m/Po7Hb0=
At the risk of sounding like a total moron, can anyone explain what is happening here?
This is from RIS, specifically RRC00. Here is some sample output of route_btoa from this file:
http://data.ris.ripe.net/rrc00/2005.11/updates.20051106.0430.gz
<snip>
BGP4MP|1131251415|STATE|193.0.0.56|3333|1|2
BGP4MP|1131251415|STATE|193.0.0.56|3333|2|4
BGP4MP|1131251415|STATE|193.0.0.56|3333|4|5
BGP4MP|1131251415|STATE|193.0.0.56|3333|5|6
BGP4MP|1131251415|A|193.0.0.56|3333|8.11.252.0/23|3333 3356 11168|IGP|193.0.0.56|0|0||NAG||
BGP4MP|1131251415|A|193.0.0.56|3333|8.11.254.0/23|3333 3356 11168|IGP|193.0.0.56|0|0||NAG||
BGP4MP|1131251415|A|193.0.0.56|3333|8.10.241.0/24|3333 1103 1273 6395 22324 22324|IGP|193.0.0.56|0|0||NAG||
BGP4MP|1131251415|A|193.0.0.56|3333|8.15.2.0/24|3333 6320 8001 6395 26049 26049 26049 26049|IGP|193.0.0.56|0|0||NAG||
</snip>
I understand AS3333 is RIS itself, is this some kind of misconfig on
their end? It seems to be announcing it's entire table every 5
minutes. This started late Friday and ended a few hours ago.
On 11/6/05, Patrick W. Gilmore <patrick@ianai.net> wrote:
On Nov 6, 2005, at 1:05 PM, NetSecGuy wrote:
> I asked this question on inet-access and it was suggested I try NANOG. > > I understand BGP flapping to be announcements followed by withdraws > over a short period. I am seeing a peer with a large number of
> announcements and the normal number of withdraws. Is there a term > to describe what I am seeing? I'd like to understand what is > happening, but I've been looking for more info and can't seem to
> find anything. I suspect I am just not using the right words to > search. > > If there isn't a term, why would a peer announce thousands of time > an hour with very few withdraws?
There is a term, it's called "broken".
A peer should never announce a route it has already announced unless that route is withdrawn. (If the session goes down or is reset, that counts as a withdrawal.)
-- TTFN, patrick
|
|
|