Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now

  • From: Drew Weaver
  • Date: Fri Nov 04 09:57:42 2005



-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On Behalf Of
Erik Haagsman
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 2:40 PM
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: John Payne; Patrick W.Gilmore; nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now


On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 18:48 -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Nov 2005 11:46:20 EST, John Payne said:

> > What am I missing? 
> 
> Obviously, the same thing that management at SBC is missing:

<snip>

> He argued that because SBC and others have invested to build
high-speed
> networks, they are due a return.
> 
> "There's going to have to be some mechanism for these people ... to
pay for the
> portion they're using. Why should they be allowed to use my pipes?" He
offered
> no details how his idea could be accomplished.
> 
> For an Internet company to "expect to use these pipes free is nuts!"
Whitacre
> added for good measure.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Quothed <-----------

	Well, the other funny thing is that SBC doesn't just spend its
own money to build these networks. They get all sorts of help from
gov't, etc with taxes and multiple other breaks.

I think that was the original complaint.

-Drew





Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.