North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: shim6 (was Re: IPv6 news)
- From: Daniel Roesen
- Date: Fri Oct 14 15:41:12 2005
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 07:27:37PM +0000, bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> the kicker here is that the applications then need some
> serious smarts to do proper source address selection.
Nope. The ULID is supposed to be static, globally unique. Just not
globally routed. Seperating topology from identification.
Something I didn't see discussed yet is that shim6 sites would need to
get a globally unique, provider independent /48 or larger... which folks
could start to announce. But I guess that address space would come from
blocks earmarked as "non-routable, it's a bogon, bad IP space, filter in
BGP at first sight!". :-)
Regards,
Daniel
--
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr@cluenet.de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
|
