North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: IPv6 Address Planning
- From: bmanning
- Date: Wed Aug 10 12:51:19 2005
> I'm very much oppossed to /56 because it's still more than most users
> need. In and of itself that doesn't matter, but it's also less than
> what some users need. This creates the situation where people try to
> make do with a /56, find out that they need a /48 after all (all
> those /64 ptps...) and have to renumber. I.e., /56 provides too much
> potential for shooting yourself in the foot.
ah... so is there the admission that renumbering in IPv6
is pretty much a myth?