North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
RE: Outage queries and notices (was Re: GBLX congestion in Dallas area)
- From: Hannigan, Martin
- Date: Wed Jun 08 10:58:46 2005
> -----Original Message-----
> From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]On Behalf Of
> Pete Templin
> Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 10:51 AM
> To: Jay R. Ashworth
> Cc: email@example.com
> Subject: Re: Outage queries and notices (was Re: GBLX congestion in
> Dallas area)
[ SNIP ]
> OK, make a separate list (i.e. nanog-alerts) with posting
> restricted to
> those on nanog-alerts-post, and we develop a policy for being
> accepted/removed on the -post list. Easy enough.
I think that these things are operational and belong here. Its'
the level that ras is talking about and the content. Saying
MCI has a massive fiber cut impacting 230 Congress IX vs.
GBLX is not doing what I demand are very different types of
I'd like to see the higher level stuff we used to do and have some
sort of information along with it vs. "i see a packet drop in XYZ".
A prefix or something. That usually makes people go look.