North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication......?
- From: Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Date: Wed Jun 08 02:49:38 2005
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=FYHuiw7Li5J2QU3WEbGnZ0an4unYjHWRGa85hjJGxoOygR+OwHdLFOSXuubsY4gnAjb3GJ3j9oy7kuHrel7MsoCuOlOcnEY6jEWoQzI4yvHt0hV70N8p6ds2V6cLwlfPD/R/9bXu7wCdr95OmsUej2P3EjhBPkO0qVGiaLpOrJo=
On 08/06/05, J.D. Falk <jdfalk@cybernothing.org> wrote:
>
> We can't have reliable reputation until we know who the mail is
> coming from -- so reliable identity is a necessary first step.
>
What the doctor ordered seems to be something like an API that'd let
you plug dkim + csv into $mta
Anyone?
--srs
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists@gmail.com)
|
