North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
- From: Jay R. Ashworth
- Date: Mon Mar 28 09:56:25 2005
On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 05:57:13PM -0500, Dean Anderson wrote:
> >Look, if I want to publish a blocklist of all domains with the
> >string "er" in them and all IP addresses ending in .7, that would be
> >a silly thing to do: but after all, it's just a list.
> There are consequences, of course, to doing irresponsible things, and to
> misleading your subscribers, and to blocking email that your subscribers
> didn't authorize you to block.
Well, you know, as much as a pain as everyone seems to think SORBS is,
this approach to the thing has a certain baby/bathwater feel to me,
Dean: it seems to make running a blacklist *at all* A Bad Thing...
which, my perception is, is *not* the sense of the Net.
As for "didn't authorize you to block", two thoughts come to mind:
first, the person with the last clear chance in a mail blacklisting
situation is the mail admin in question, is it not? If you're running
blacklists, and you're concerned about what they block, I should think
it would be up to you to back-check the judgement of the BL operator by
doing end-to-end testing.
And second, to the extent that you *are* using a given list, I suspect
(and IANAL, of course), that you are -- constructively -- allowing them
to act as your agent for the purpose of deciding which mail to block
(absent caselaw to the contrary, which I'll admit I haven't
researched), which gives you a lot less leeway to be mad at them.
And of course, the only *real* liability you ought to have in the first
place is to *your users*, and as long as you're disclosing to them that
you use mail BL's, then that one's a bit arguable, as well.
-- jr 'IANAI,E' a
Jay R. Ashworth email@example.com
Designer Baylink RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates The Things I Think '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA http://baylink.pitas.com +1 727 647 1274
If you can read this... thank a system administrator. Or two. --me