Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: Gtld transfer process

  • From: william(at)elan.net
  • Date: Tue Jan 18 06:50:23 2005


On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, Bruce Tonkin wrote:

> Hello Brandon,
> 
> Thanks for your feedback.
> 
> > 
> > My experience has been that getting auth_info (which criminal 
> > staff would have access to) from bad registrars is almost 
> > impossible, with registrar-LOCK too they have enough control 
> > to negate the gain in being able to pull a domain to a new 
> > registrar - you still need the cooperation of the old one so 
> > it's just as bad as the old way but lots more risk for everyone
> > 
> > EPP is thus of no advantage and registrar pull is dangerous
> 
> Thus are you basically proposing that the registrant rely on cooperation
> with the old registrar, and if that fails, rely on ICANN to enforce
> compliance if the old registrars doesn't cooperate?

I would propose the following:

1. Keep existing model but make it "SHOULD" for old registrar to inform
   of upcoming transfer (I still don't understand how that failed in 
   panix.com case BTW, because I'm pretty certain dotster does it, the
   only thing I can think of is that they did but answer was lost among
   all the spam that hostmaster account received).

2. Allow for fast way to reverse the domain transfer for old register.
   I'd propose the following:
    a. Old registrar can use special registry function to request 
       reversal within 5 days of the transfer and that is immediatly
       granted (no questions asked at that time) with immediate restoration
       of old NS servers
    b. After that is done the following day the registry (i.e. Verisign)
       rather then either of the registrars must send its own confirmation 
       that transfer was authorized to contacts unless it receives word
       from old registrar that contact information can not be trusted
       (in some cases people loose their domains because somebody else
        gained access to email account listed under administrator in whois) 
    c. If it receives no answer, then it must inform old registrar and 
       expect explanation for their request for reversal including how 
       they got in touch with the registrant.
    d. The cost of the procedure should be about equivalent to normal domain
       registration and the losing registrar (i.e. the one that expected to
       receive domain but failed to receive proper authorization if reversal
       was final or old registrar that improperly requested the procedure
       if it was so) should pay it.
 
-- 
William Leibzon
Elan Networks
william@elan.net





Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.