North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: Association of Trustworthy Roots?
- From: William Allen Simpson
- Date: Sun Jan 16 22:40:59 2005
Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, Chris Adams wrote:Why yes, you must have missed the messages. The domain owner and ISP
If the proper procedure was circumvented in the first place (which
If it can be proven to have been cicumvented, sure. I don't think anything
appears to be the case with panix.com), then it should be circumvented
to repair the damage as fast as possible.
beyond conjecture about that has been said 'publicly' yet, has it?
and registrar all clearly stated that they had received no notification,
and had not approved the transfer. Notification and approval are
required by the process. Therefore, it was proven to be circumvented.
Now, as to the actual mechanism of circumvention, that has not yet been
revealed here. All we know is that a registry *supervisor* stopped the
workers from finishing their investigation.
Clearly, this .com registry operator is not trustworthy.
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32