Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: MLPPP Follow Up - How we fixed the problem

  • From: jlewis
  • Date: Wed Mar 31 23:31:30 2004

On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Mark E. Mallett wrote:

> > ip route X.X.X.X 255.255.255.252 Serial1/0/0/13:0
> > ip route X.X.X.X 255.255.255.252 Serial2/1/0/14:0
> >
> >
> > The only problem that we ran into was that we had to use the Serial designator
> > of the interface in our route statement otherwise it will not work (or
> > at least it did not for us).
>
> FWIW I have also observed that it is necessary to specify the
> interface when doing per-packet load balancing across multiple PVCs,
> e.g. as when doing load balancing across multiple DSL circuits.  I

I've done lots of this (with clear T1's, no frame or DSL), and never run
into that issue on 3640, 7206, 7500 series routers.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Jon Lewis *jlewis@lewis.org*|  I route
 Senior Network Engineer     |  therefore you are
 Atlantic Net                |
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________




Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.