North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: To send or not to send 'virus in email' notifications?
- From: Leo Bicknell
- Date: Wed Aug 20 13:24:51 2003
In a message written on Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 10:04:05AM -0700, Steve Thomas wrote:
> From: Steve Thomas <email@example.com>
> To: Leo Bicknell <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Subject: Re: To send or not to send 'virus in email' notifications?
[other headers editied]
> NO! Some organizations (the company I work for, for instance) use MailScanner on incoming AND outgoing mail. I tried telling this to the person who sent the Postfix regex, but, of course, my mail was rejected.
> MailScanner is a very widely used product, and adding rules/filters like the one above only adds to the problems that the virus author is trying to create. Please forward this to NANOG - I tried subscribing to NANOG-POST, but my subscription request was bounced with "content rejected".
Note, unlike the postfix rule his message still made it past
spamassassin has he had enough "non-spam" qualities to offset the
rule I suggested adding.
Please keep in mind there may be legitimate e-mail with these headers
if you're going to use rules such have been suggested here.
Leo Bicknell - email@example.com - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Read TMBG List - firstname.lastname@example.org, www.tmbg.org
Description: PGP signature