North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: Complaint of the week: Ebay abuse mail (slightly OT)
- From: Michael.Dillon
- Date: Mon Aug 04 08:41:39 2003
>we all knew that profitable large network owners would change the
>compared to merely ebitda-positive large network owners, and here's an
>example of how "big company" cost management practices can go up against
>"reasonable and customary internet behaviour" and pretty much ignore it.
Having an abuse@ email address may be customary Internet behavior but it
is no longer reasonable. The fact is that SMTP email has outlived its
usefulness and needs to be replaced with something that provides a chain
of authentication that certifies the sender's identity. Once email senders
are no longer able to falsify their identity, then it will again be
economically feasible for companies to accept abuse@ email from anyone.
Instead of working to prevent email relaying, we should be working to
encourage it along with certification of the sender's identity. If we had
a web of ISP mail servers that trust each other to certify the sender's
identity, then people would be happy to accept any and all email relayed
through that web.
The web of trusted email servers would use a new and improved mail
transfer protocol (NIMTP) that would only be used to exchange email
between trusted servers. Users could continue to use authenticated SMTP to
initiate the sending of email, but nobody would accept any unauthenticated
SMTP servers any more.