Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: anti-spam vs network abuse

  • From: David G. Andersen
  • Date: Fri Feb 28 16:17:16 2003

On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 03:11:00PM -0600, Jack Bates quacked:
> >
> > Should we outlaw a potentially beneficial practice due to its abuse by
> > criminals?
> >
> Okay. What happens if you make a mistake and overload one of my devices
> costing my company money. I guarantee you, the law will look favorably on
> damages. That is the problem with probing. Sometimes the probe itself can be
> the damage. Programmers are human. Humans make mistakes. Programmers are
> perfect.

That wasn't the question.  There are plenty of circumstances in
which it's legal to do something once  -- say, make a phone
call to you and ask how you're doing -- and illegal to do it
one hundred million times.  You don't outlaw telephones because
people can and have used them to harass other people, you outlaw
the harassing behavior and make it subject to damages. ... which
is exactly what you described.

Probing can be knocking on your door, or it can be taking a sledgehammer
to your garage.  These are so quantitatively different that there
is a qualitative shift between the behaviors.

  -Dave

-- 
work: dga@lcs.mit.edu                          me:  dga@pobox.com
      MIT Laboratory for Computer Science           http://www.angio.net/
      I do not accept unsolicited commercial email.  Do not spam me.




Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.