North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
RE: Remote email access
- From: Al Rowland
- Date: Tue Feb 04 13:25:30 2003
Don't even need that. I can telnet into the appropriate server/port from
a command prompt but, like your solution below, that is not non-geek
friendly. We need a solution that is AOL user friendly, not NANOG user
friendly if we ever expect to make money with this thing called the
Internet. This will always be tragedy-of-the-commons; the very things
that make service attractive for Joe PayingCustomer also make it easy
for Joe Spammer/Hax0r.
Open<->Secure, choose your business plan carefully. Good Luck.
Best regards,
______________________________
Al Rowland
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On
> Behalf Of David Lesher
> Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 10:06 AM
> To: nanog list
> Subject: Re: Remote email access
>
>
>
> Unnamed Administration sources reported that Al Rowland said:
> >
> >
> > Only convenient kludge that is (mostly) provider independent is a
> > webmail service, a completely different can of worms/flame war.
>
> Or a shell account at Panix, reached via SSH.
>
> $100.00/year is worth it to me; YMMV.
>
>
>
>
> --
> A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz@nrk.com
> & no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301)
> 56-LINUX Unless the host (that isn't
> close).........................pob 1433 is busy, hung or
> dead....................................20915-1433
>
|
