North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security?
- From: E.B. Dreger
- Date: Wed Jan 29 18:28:38 2003
ML> Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 12:58:58 -0800
ML> From: Mathew Lodge
ML> No, it isn't, as is doing buf_t[x] rather than pointer
True. I just like having a struct so I may pass a single
variable in function calls instead of a whole mess of them.
ML> arithmetic, but the *practical* problem is that you really
ML> In other words, there are far fewer compilers, interpreters,
ML> Java Virtual Machines, libraries etc. in use than there are
ML> programmers using them. So working the tools angle gives you
ML> leverage across far more programmers and the programs they
Yes, although there's a certain level of "bare minimum clue"
required, no matter what the tools. On comp.programming,
someone recently asked if they could write C++ programs in VB
6.0. Ummmm.... my guess is they'd make a rotten C++ programmer.
Hopefully it was a joe job or silliness, and not a bona fide
Is it unreasonable to ask that programmers not assume memory is
initialized, to check bounds as needed, and to realize that
operations are NOT atomic without special protection[*]? I
don't think so. Sure, it's extra work; put it in a library.
[*] Special protection that, for obvious reasons, is unavailable
in userland. Hence fstat(2), fchown(2), fchdir(2), etc for
Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
From: A Trap <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.
These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots.
Do NOT send mail to <email@example.com>, or you are likely to