North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security?
- From: Richard A Steenbergen
- Date: Wed Jan 29 12:43:01 2003
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 05:26:06PM +0000, E.B. Dreger wrote:
> If you check before each byte. Checking for sufficient space
> first ("is there room for a 245-byte string?") is much faster.
> Besides, looking at all the bloated code using indirect function
> calls[*] and crappy code using poor algorithms... is speed really
> a concern?
> [*] Try profiling indirect function calls on x86, especially
> newer cores. Such instructions carry a stiff penalty... but
> there's no shortage of virtual functions in certain software.
> (Think: OWL and MFC libraries.)
Note I'm making a distinction between fixing the string libraries to
handle overflow situations better, and changing the entire OS to do array
bounds checking. One is good, the other is not.
Richard A Steenbergen <email@example.com> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)