Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: iBGP next hop and multi-access media

  • From: John M. Brown
  • Date: Tue Oct 08 10:03:06 2002

Let me see if I got this.

Route A:
	unknown networks behind it
	uses 10.10.10.2 as a neighbor to router B

Router B:
	has a network  172.16.16/24 
	uses 10.10.10.1 as a neighbor to router A.

Router A's table shows
	172.16.16/24  -> 10.10.10.2


You want Router A to ARP and pretend its on the local
broadcast domain for the 172.16.16/24 prefix.

But that prefix is NOT local to router A, thus it must
ROUTE and thus uses  the NexHop in its table.



It seems you description is wrong....  But I don't know..

Please clarify


On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 12:44:07PM -0400, Ralph Doncaster wrote:
> 
> Background: 
> Router A and B are connected via a common ethernet segment 1. Router A
> uses 10.10.10.1/30, and Router B uses 10.10.10.2/30. Router B also has
> another subnet configured for ethernet segment 1; 172.16.16.0/24.
> 
> When I setup a situation like the above, with Router B advertising the
> 172.16.16.0/24 to router A, router A sees a next hop of 10.10.10.2.  This
> is not good since packets from A going to the 172.16.16 subnet get sent to
> Router B, which then ARPs the desitnation, instead of just being ARPed by
> router A.
> 
> I don't want to turn on ICMP redirects on B since they're insecure and
> ugly.  I've also made sure I'm not using next-hop self.  Is there a way to
> make this work?
> 
> Ralph Doncaster
> principal, IStop.com 
> 
> 




Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.