North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: layer 3 switch debate
- From: Stephen Sprunk
- Date: Fri Sep 27 13:13:32 2002
Thus spake "ip dude" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> IP Community:
> When designing an all IP network requiring mostly Ethernet interfaces, the
logical conclusion is to specify layer 3 switches (instead of routers). The cost
per port and functionality requirements make a layer 3 switch the perfect
choice. However, the rule of thumb in the IP community is that routers are
superior to layer 3 switches and should be utilized instead, especially when
considering core type functionality.
> Does this rule of thumb still apply considering the modern layer 3 switches
available? If not, why? What makes a layer 3 switch sub-standard to a pure
router? Any quantitative analysis you could provide would be greatly
"switch" is a marketing term meaning fast, nothing more. Any device that
operates at Layer 3 is a router by definition. Therefore, "Layer 3 switch"
means "fast router".
Now think about your question again.