North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: IP over in-ground cable applications.
- From: David G. Andersen
- Date: Thu Sep 12 15:13:19 2002
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 03:04:35PM -0400, Deepak Jain mooed:
> You would need multicast speakers (routers, etc) along the cable route to
> effectively multiple your bandwidth at all. Since cable is already
> multicasting (1 stream to many/all) I don't think I see any advantage.
> Unless, of course, you expect cable customers to be broadcasting to other
> cable customers (say their own home video content)... Then MPEG2 Multicast
> would be your friend.
I don't think the answer is as simple as that. It really depends
on the number of subscribers per last-hop multicast box, and on
the number of channels you offer / popularity distribution of
If you've got 5 channels and 10,000 subscribers per box,
multicast saves you nothing. If you've got 1000 channels and
100 subscribers per box, ...
work: firstname.lastname@example.org me: email@example.com
MIT Laboratory for Computer Science http://www.angio.net/
I do not accept unsolicited commercial email. Do not spam me.