North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: IP address fee??
- From: Christopher Schulte
- Date: Thu Sep 05 15:24:29 2002
At 11:39 AM 9/5/2002 -0700, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
> At least as importantly, why do 254 addresses get provided where the
> actual need might not warrant that quantity?
Because it's easier to do the reverse DNS? Sorry to contribute to the
general noise, but that answer's close to the truth.
Easier maybe... But with classless delegation of IN-ADDR.ARPA
this should not be an issue any longer.
...some sort of steganographic chaffing and winnowing scheme
already exists in practice right here: I frequently find myself
having to sort through large numbers of idiotic posts to find
the good ones. -- Rufus Faloofus
Do not un-munge my @nospam.schulte.org
email address. This address is valid.