North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
RE: Eliminating physical colocation (was Re: Shared facilities)
- From: Gerald
- Date: Wed Aug 21 17:51:25 2002
These places do not have cameras and evidence that point to malicious
intent to destroy your network?
I'm sorry but that would make me just about irate, and definitely insist
on moving the equipment ASAP. I don't plan on paying for colo facilities
that I have any doubt in the integrity of the people with access to the
(Similar Disclaimer: I've never met a union worker that wanted to do more
for the customer, than for themselves. Their blatant apathy can be a
detriment to real work in times of emergencies.)
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Deepak Jain wrote:
> We have seen disgruntled Union members hit the EPO in data centers in
> Union-friendly cities.
> Not pretty outcome, no matter how much redundancy you have.
> Fire code is not compatible with Union rules.
> (Disclaimer, I have a completely unbalanced view of Union workers, all bad.
> I know
> there are good Union workers, but I have never met any professionally -- I
> have met
> plenty AFTER retirement though).
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]On Behalf Of
> > Vincent J. Bono
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 2:50 PM
> > To: N. Richard Solis; Sean Donelan; firstname.lastname@example.org
> > Subject: Re: Eliminating physical colocation (was Re: Shared facilities)
> > We have always had more of an issue with "Union Members" rather than
> > "Verizon Employees" per se. If you don't use Union Labor to install in
> > Boston or New York you had best have a secured cabinet or else 25 pair
> > bundles seem to spontaneously develop slices.