North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
RE: Sprint peering policy
- From: Mitchell, Dan
- Date: Wed Jun 26 14:59:52 2002
RE: Majdi -- I just wanted to thoroughly address Alex's question.
Besides, Allegiance *has* to make it, because I certainly can't go get a job
at WCom anymore, can I? :-)
From: Majdi S. Abbas [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 2:48 PM
To: Mitchell, Dan
Subject: Re: Sprint peering policy
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 02:34:42PM -0400, Mitchell, Dan wrote:
> a strong management team (after all, they *did* build MFS)
`- I think you have mistaken this for an endorsement.
And in the age of cooked books, stated revenue can be
misleading, particularly when it looks too good to be true.
I would be very wary of anyone in this business right now,
particularly a CLEC.
Regardless, I don't think shameless corporate plugs
really belong on NANOG, but I'll allow that perhaps I am in