North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: ATTBI refuses to do reverse DNS?
- From: Daniel Senie
- Date: Tue Jun 18 17:50:25 2002
At 05:29 PM 6/18/02, Stephen Griffin wrote:
While I believe people SHOULD be providing INADDR service, the people hurt
by refusing connections are rarely the ones who have any influence. Just as
Network Address Translation is not a security solution, neither is checking
INADDR. Now if you check INADDR over Secure DNS, you might start having
some level of information to trust.
In the referenced message, Daniel Senie said:
> At 02:30 PM 6/18/02, Lou Katz wrote:
> >Is this common?
> I have a CDPD card which has a fixed address. It's from Verizon Wireless.
> There's no INADDR. There seems to be a lack of understanding and clue all
> around on INADDR, which is the motivation for the above-mentioned draft.
> Having something to point network operators and server operators to would,
> IMO, help.
The lack of clue tends to be on the providing in-addr side of things.
I think it is a great thing to refuse connections from ips without
in-addr, in the same way it is great to refuse mail from domains that
don't provide postmaster addresses.
It is a means through which one can influence the laziness of others.
Simply disregarding what others do, only legitimizes the laziness, and
continues us along the road of everyone doing the absolute minimum.
Well, this engineer also has customers to take care of. Those customers
cannot easily influence ATT Broadband or ATT Wireless to do things "right".
So, I choose to keep having customers rather than closing down my business
over others not having INADDR.
Simply accepting the connections seems to be a "path of least resistance"
which befits a pointy-hair more than an engineer.
Please explain how a customer changes to another broadband vendor, or
another CDPD vendor. Despite your company's presence in a limited number of
markets, there are MANY people out there with only one choice (if they're
lucky) for broadband. I'd be more likely to lose a customer than get them
to change ISPs.
> >I suppose I could set up a bogus reverse for him, but, feh...
> Either you set up something, or you can make your server not care about
> reverse, or lose the customer.
You neglect to include the option of the customer changing to an ISP
that provides in-addr.
Daniel Senie firstname.lastname@example.org
Amaranth Networks Inc. http://www.amaranth.com