North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server.
- From: Arnold Nipper
- Date: Thu Jun 06 10:31:49 2002
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 04:13:08PM +0200, Daniska Tomas wrote:
> how would you guarantee connectivity?
as you have a lot of ISPs around you it should be really easy to get some
connectivity. Very easy: tell some friendly ISP to announce your prefix/AS
> should each isp present should provide bandwidth as part of collocation expenses?
What do you mean by this? If some ISP want to donate bw, nice. If not also Ok.
> should the opexes be included in the colo bill?
Which colo bill?
> and then - this would probably make the colo becoming a connectivity provider, wouldn't it?
Not necessarily. This much depends on your IXP model. Let's take DE-CIX.
There is an association running DE-CIX, but InterXion as colo partner takes
cae for a lot of things. If DE-CIX would offer infrastructural services,
InterXion still would remain a simple colo provider.
Arnold Nipper Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
DE-CIX, The German Internet Exchange Mobile: +49 172 2650958