North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: Bogon list
- From: Miquel van Smoorenburg
- Date: Wed Jun 05 04:37:35 2002
- Distribution: cistron
- Newsgroups: lists.nanog
In article <cistron.20020605013323.A7C1EC7936@cesium.clock.org>,
Sean M. Doran <email@example.com> wrote:
>| Why treat exchange subnets differently to any other bit of backbone
>Oh, I wholeheartedly agree. I would love them all to use RFC 1918
>addresses, because it is VERY VERY VERY rare that anything outside
>the scope in which the 1918 local use addresses are unique actually
>has to communicate with backbone infrastructure of any type.
And again Path MTU discovery gets broken.
>What communication can your workstation have with an XYZNET router?
Receive ICMP size exceeded packets ?
I haven't seen a 'icmp source lo0' interface command yet. Hopefully
it will be added for ipv6 so exchanges can use link-local addressing
(ipv6 has no fragmentation, PMTUd is mandatory).