North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: Routing Table inconsistencies
- From: Jared Mauch
- Date: Tue Jun 19 01:27:11 2001
Those are exchange point networks.
I'd expect to see those as inconsistent.
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 07:28:31PM -0400, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> Hello All;
> We had a problem with a domain with two different AS paths in the BGP table, so I wrote a script to
> look for such problems.
> There are two prefixes in the current MBGP tables here with such problems :
> Date of BGP Dump Mon Jun 18 15:39:46 EDT 2001
> ROUTING INCONSISTENCY Detected for Prefix = 184.108.40.206 :
> *> 220.127.116.11 18.104.22.168 75 0 1239 10888 i
> * 22.214.171.124 0 145 24 i
> ROUTING INCONSISTENCY Detected for Prefix = 126.96.36.199 :
> * 188.8.131.52 184.108.40.206 0 145 24 i
> *> 220.127.116.11 75 0 1239 10888 i
> And a total of 488 prefixes in the BGP tables with such problems !!!!!
> The complete lists are contained in
> http://www.multicasttech.com/status/mbgp.inconsistency and
> I could update these regularly if there was any demand.
> I may be obtuse, but I cannot see how this could be a good thing.
> Marshall Eubanks
> T.M. Eubanks
> Multicast Technologies, Inc
> 10301 Democracy Lane, Suite 410
> Fairfax, Virginia 22030
> Phone : 703-293-9624 Fax : 703-293-9609
> e-mail : email@example.com
> Test your network for multicast : http://www.multicasttech.com/mt/
> Check the status of multicast in real time :
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from firstname.lastname@example.org
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.