North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
RE: C&W Peering
- From: James Thomason
- Date: Mon Jun 04 23:51:14 2001
No, this is the part where I laugh at all of the people who told me this
how wonderfully effecient Inter-provider settlement and 95th percentile
billing are in the Internet today.
On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Vivien M. wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Christopher A. Woodfield [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> > Sent: June 4, 2001 7:55 PM
> > To: John Starta
> > Cc: Vivien M.; Mike Hughes; Sean Donelan; email@example.com
> > Subject: Re: C&W Peering
> > I don't think that this is going to be solved by C&W reversing
> > themselves;
> > I think PSI is going to have to get itself some transit, and quickly.
> Is this the part where the people (eg: Exodus, AboveNet are the two I can
> think of immediately) who were forced to get themselves some transit because
> PSI wouldn't peer with them anymore go and laugh at the irony of C&W pulling
> a PSI on PSI themselves?
> Vivien M.
> Assistant System Administrator
> Dynamic DNS Network Services