North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: Using unallocated address space
- From: Sean Donelan
- Date: Thu Feb 15 17:23:51 2001
On Thu, 15 February 2001, Alan Hannan wrote:
> In this scenario you outline, combined with your proposal of
> a registry announcing 'black-holing routes' -- what compels
> the ISP to accept and act upon the routing announcement?
> And how does this different situation protect them from the
> lawsuits you suggest below?
What "compels" ISPs to filter 0.0.0.0/255.255.255.255 from their
peers and not to announce it to their peers?
I believe Paul Vixie is having a BOF at NANOG to discuss best practices
between ISPs. And now that I don't operate a network, I've thought
about publishing my full peering agreement as a template.