Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Using unallocated address space

  • From: Sean Donelan
  • Date: Thu Feb 15 17:23:51 2001

On Thu, 15 February 2001, Alan Hannan wrote:
>   In this scenario you outline, combined with your proposal of
>   a registry announcing 'black-holing routes' -- what compels
>   the ISP to accept and act upon the routing announcement?
> 
>   And how does this different situation protect them from the 
>   lawsuits you suggest below?

What "compels" ISPs to filter 0.0.0.0/255.255.255.255 from their
peers and not to announce it to their peers?

I believe Paul Vixie is having a BOF at NANOG to discuss best practices
between ISPs.  And now that I don't operate a network, I've thought
about publishing my full peering agreement as a template.







Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.