North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: More route-table bloat vs. ARIN micro-allocations
- From: NANOG Mailing List
- Date: Tue Feb 22 13:21:19 2000
On Tue, 22 Feb 2000, Ulf Zimmermann wrote:
> > The point is, those /27s, /30s and /32s are *not* on the 'Net, they are
> > internal to C&W. You should not condemn the global table because C&W leaks
> > specifics to their customers.
>
> I am not connected directly to C&W, but via Exodus and I see the same
> routes like 63.84.242.192/26. So they not only inside of C&W and to their
> customers.
>
> --
> Regards, Ulf.
As we see 63.82.242.192:
*63.80.0.0/13
Neighbor: 209.115.127.21
Description: FNSI TRANSIT
ASPath: 6259 3549 701(IGP)
Nexthop: 209.115.127.21 Weight: 0
Localpref: 100
Last update: Tue Feb 22 11:31:39 2000
Sheesh folks. If your upstream isn't filtering at /24, you REALLY can do
it yourself. If it bothers you so much, contact whomever is leaking
prefixes longer than /24. Don't bitch and whine about it.
John Fraizer
|
