North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: www.etrade.com has no DNS A record !
- From: John Hawkinson
- Date: Tue Jan 25 22:09:23 2000
Why is discussion of a single site's DNS configuration screwup
appropriate for NANOG?
Is your goal to get the word out to people who use E*TRADE?
I don't think NANOG is right for that.
Is your goal to get the word out to network providers of people
who use E*TRADE? Do you really expect that many of them will
forward this announcement or make good use of it? Should
a message be sent to NANOG every time CNN, Netscape, or Yahoo
Am I missing something here? [Like a sense of humor?]
> Delivered-To: email@example.com
> X-Sender: (Unverified)
> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2
> Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 11:11:57 -0500
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> From: Kai Schlichting <email@example.com>
> Subject: www.etrade.com has no DNS A record !
> Precedence: bulk
> Errors-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> X-Loop: nanog
> Expect some major customer complaints about this one: www.etrade.com has
> no A record, and all other addresses are redirected to that very name.
> I just sent this to Etrade: