Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: follow up on gigabit either

  • From: Dorian Kim
  • Date: Wed Dec 23 23:32:52 1998

On Wed, Dec 23, 1998 at 08:00:29PM -0800, George Herbert wrote:
> 
> K wrote:
> [useful summary of gigabit ether situation]
> 
> >Steve also made exclnt point that the ATM vs 'promiscuous' medium
> >	have other inherent distinction of potential interest 
> >	to ISPs with policy/privacy/security concerns
> 
> I'm not quite sure I understand this bit; isn't switched ether
> (of any speed) equally secure as an ATM switch would be?

One aspect of this has more to do with on by default vs off by default
nature of traffic in the mesh. In an multiaccess broadcast medium, port A 
can send traffic to port B. In a (virtual)circuit switched environment, 
this can't be done w/o setting up explicit connections between the two 
parties.

Given the occasional creative uses of multiaccess broadcast media exchange 
points, this can be seen as a major operational win, although some ATM 
exchange operators set up full mesh of PVCs by default, negating this 
advantage.

Port filtering on multiaccess broadcast media can provide this feature
if the switches can do this w/o melting.

-dorian




Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.