North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: BBN Peering issues
- From: Robert Bowman
- Date: Fri Aug 14 15:44:20 1998
I believe he meant private interconnect.
As you know, Sprint's contracts strictly forbid discussing
interconnection points in any detail by either party.
> | I checked before doing so, and I checked once again in light of your
> | allegation. And, according to Exodus, this *IS* a PX.
> If by PX you mean "public exchange point", then Sprint is
> being unusually inconsistent with its naming, numbering, and
> topology conventions.
> I'm curious as to which exchange point it is, if that in fact is
> what PX means.
> Of course, whatever type of connection it is, I'm curious about
> the fact that packets are always drawn towards this one connection.
> Are there others? If so, are they down or something?
> Sean. (wondering why Sprint would give away a single free T3)