Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Network Operators and smurf

  • From: John A. Tamplin
  • Date: Fri Apr 24 19:11:09 1998

On Fri, 24 Apr 1998, Karl Denninger wrote:

> Well, there is a simple knob for this:
> 
> If the Knob is turned "ON", then any packet from a source address which is 
> not routed to the interface it came in on is dropped.
> 
> This works for static, dynamic, and all other kinds of routing.    It will
> solve the problem and is trivial to implement - if any of the vendors care.

It doesn't work for asymmetric routing as you describe it above. If you
modify your criteria to be that there are no valid routes out that
interface, you would only break transient routing conditions, but
depending on how the router stores routes it may not be possible (or
desirable due to memory requirements) to implement. 

John Tamplin					Traveller Information Services
jat@Traveller.COM				2104 West Ferry Way
205/883-4233x7007				Huntsville, AL 35801





Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.