North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: SMURF amplifier block list
- From: Andrew Smith
- Date: Tue Apr 14 22:24:18 1998
> As far as .0 and .255 addresses go, I'm no more "asking for trouble" by
> using those than I'm asking for trouble by running an IRC server. They
> are completely valid addresses. Perhaps those making such comments are
> better at getting IP space than we are, but we need to squeeze every IP we
> possibly can into use just to provide enough addresses to our customers.
Not to make this note a total flame ... but are you really honestly
trying to say that ARIN won't give you more addresses if you don't
use .0 and .255 addresses on all /23 and larger prefixes?
Out of all the /17-/23 prefixes out there on the net, what percentage
would people say are truely used on a network in "classful supernet"
configurations. Out of that percentage, what percent of those are in
such a dire situation with their past network allocation history that
their future allocations depend on actually allocating and using, in a
production environment, 510 addresses out of a /23 instead of a mere 508?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
** Andrew W. Smith ** awsmith@neosoft.com ** Chief Network Engineer **
** http://www.neosoft.com/neosoft/staff/andrew ** 1-888-NEOSOFT **
** "Opportunities multiply as they are seized" - Sun Tzu **
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
