North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: Lots of non-existant networks
- From: Abha Ahuja
- Date: Thu Jun 26 14:43:15 1997
We started tracking this kind of information too... Check out:
We're hoping that these tools make it easier for the community to
diagnose and troubleshoot these types of routing and policy problems.
Let us know what you think of them...
On Thu, 26 Jun 1997, Curtis Villamizar wrote:
> In message <Pine.SOL.3.95.970618151012.15875Aemail@example.com>, "Eric D
> . Madison" writes:
> > There still seems to be a lot of Routes out there that are not in the
> > RADB. I know that ANS is not excepting routes not in a routing database,
> > and others are starting to follow. It's a good idea!
> > I am not getting some of these routes because of the lack of an RADB
> > entry, and it's very frustrating..
> > Anyone else having the same problems??
> > Ohh one more thing.. Seems that there are also some routes that are being
> > advertised that don't even have a InterNIC/RIPE/APNIC entry either..
> > If they don't have an entry, then they are not real "Valid" routes, so I
> > don't want to route them.. but the Origin is from a large
> > provider.. any suggestions? Seems that they have build their whole
> > infrastructure on these routes too.
> > Eric
> > _______________________________________________________
> > Eric D. Madison - Senior Network Engineer -
> > ACSI - Advanced Data Services - ATM/IP Backbone Group
> > 24 Hour NMC/NOC (800)291-7889 Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
> The route-dumps anaylsys page has been updated. It provides quite a
> bit more detail, some ANS specific (sorry). The URL is:
> New stuff on this page are:
> Listing by border AS - so we know who we can bug if a reachability
> problem is reported and we know how much will be missing due to
> filtering on a per border AS basis. It also helps us concentrate on
> routes passed to us by our direct customers. This would be useful
> to others if they peer with some of the same border AS.
> Reports now include (as of the most recent one):
> 2477 unregistered prefixes
> 240 prefixes unreachable due to incorrect origin AS
> 2 prefixes with no ANS policy
> 15 prefixes with incorrect ANS policy
> 2074 prefixes registered with incorrect origin AS (a warning)
> Each problem category is also sorted by border AS and origin AS
> Pages are available which report on only a specific border AS and/or
> origin AS. These are useful to anyone wanting to clean up their own
> AS, since the observed paths for each prefix is provided.
> Information is available down to the prefix, with observed AS paths
> reported, as well as the [sort of encrypted - consider it a bug] ANS
> policy in cases where ANS policy is thought to be the problem.
> Of the 22 border AS with any unregistered prefixes (46 with some sort
> of problem or warning), the worst offenders are the border AS with
> over 90 unregistered prefixes:
> AS174 (149),
> AS286 (94),
> AS568 (166),
> AS701 (550),
> AS1239 (1131),
> AS1800 (443).
> There are 398 origin AS with unregistered prefixes, most with just a
> btw- the "15 prefixes with incorrect ANS policy" both seem to be due
> to a transient where we intentionally do not accept a backup route
> from the CIX for certain providers we directly peer with yet the CIX
> was announcing one. The "2 prefixes with no ANS policy" are one
> prefix origin AS and we addressed this after the report.
abha ahuja email@example.com
Merit Network, Inc.