North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
RE: Remote Operations question
- From: Alex Rubenstein
- Date: Thu Mar 13 20:47:35 1997
Any thoughts on the peering question?
At 06:09 PM 3/8/97 -0700, Rodney Joffe wrote:
>As far as why........ well let's see; when the router gets hosed in
>our cage, and we open a ticket with MFS, and it takes 5 hours before
>they arrive..... it seems a lot more logical to be able to power cycle
>it out of band without waiting. Now if MFS's facility was truly a 24 x 7
>facility, which you would expect for a place that was that important :-)
>By the way, your $500 is much less than the last bill they sent us ...
>Amazing... and we didn't even see the gun in their hands.
>Genuity Inc., a Bechtel company
>>From: Alex Rubenstein [SMTP:email@example.com]
>>Sent: Saturday, March 08, 1997 4:22 PM
>>To: Rodney Joffe; 'firstname.lastname@example.org'
>>Subject: Re: Remote Operations question
>>Leviton has some stuff the we use, they have some things that can do 20
>>The better question; why? What is the 7513 doing that you need it to be
>>rebooted? I can be paid to go do it for you; lets say, $500 ea time? :-)
>>At 04:18 PM 3/8/97 -0700, Rodney Joffe wrote:
>>>Is anyone using any kind of out of band controlled power system that
>>>will support remote power cycling of multiple devices with high power
>>>ratings? I'd like to be able to cycle individual components in our racks
>>>at NAPs (especially MAE E!) including 7513s. All the devices we've
>>>found are limited to 15 amps total. I think a 7513 requires 20amps on
>>>Genuity Inc., a Bechtel company
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -