North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
RE: Class "B" forsale (fwd)
- From: Jim Fleming
- Date: Mon Mar 10 13:16:22 1997
On Monday, March 10, 1997 8:34 AM, Alex P. Rudnev[SMTP:alex@Relcom.EU.net] wrote:
@ Hi. It's not good idea to discusse _can we /NIC/ allow or can we
@ More interesting is _how to prevent address space wasting_ and _how to
@ prevent extra payements..._.
@ If you'll disallow class B selling, Internet would lost 256*256
@ addresses, because this class B network would be unused (and somebody
@ would use class C networks instead_. It's bad thing, isn't it?
@ On the other hand, if you'll allow free saling of the address space,
@ internet would be the homeplace of the big nabobs who can bye total
@ address space and break down small competitors (and even small
@ countries); it'll mean the deaths of the Internet, isn't it?
This is the case now...upstream providers are the "big nabobs"...
they do not incur the costs of renumbering, they do not get concerned
when they make a bid to a customer, they have the resources
to deliver. They may not have paid for these resources but they
have them...just check the records...
@ I do not know how would NOC go between this _scilla_ and _charibda_, but
@ it's one of this important questions the internet's future depends of.
Yes...some people feel this is a very important area....
unfortunately, the solutions being proposed favor the
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -