Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: The Big Squeeze

  • From: Sean Donelan
  • Date: Sun Mar 02 23:41:38 1997

>> I would suggest that the largest percentage of flapping prefixes in the
>> global routing system belong to prefixes longer than /19.
>
>Hence the convention to damp differently for different lengths.  See one of
>the foils in http://www.psg.com/~randy/970210.nanog/, which suggests that we
>over here start following the European lead on this.

Is the route computation of a /8 prefix flapping once a second any
different than a /24 flapping once a second?  If /8's are "naturally"
more stable, then why allow them to flap more before dampening them?

When dampening was first being rolled out I remember one of the early
networks that got hit was PSI's net 38/8.  Treating flapping prefixes
differently based on length has more to do with how many people scream
when prefixes covering a large amount of address space get dampened
than the impact of the route flap of an individual prefix on the router.

Although most folks have permanently filtered it, isn't 1/8 still the
flappiest prefix of all.
-- 
Sean Donelan, Data Research Associates, Inc, St. Louis, MO
  Affiliation given for identification not representation
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -




Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.