North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?)
- From: Neil J. McRae
- Date: Wed Jan 15 11:54:03 1997
On Wed, 15 Jan 1997 10:58:50 EST
"John W. Stewart III" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> so talk to your provider about deploying it, don't bash
> cisco who has already rolled new images
> and on the point of providers, do you really think they
> would continue to run code that causes them problems
> (whether cisco calls it a "bug" or an "optimization")?
> if providers thought it was a bug, then they would have
> anxiously awaited an announcement for an image that had
> the fix so that they could deploy it
You'd be amazed. Doing a router upgrade isn't a simple quick 5 second
thing to do. That has to be planned, and if people see it as bugfix
they are more likely to upgrade.
I used to keep 1 weeks worth of BGP4 logs for all of my employers
peers, now I can't keep 1 hours because of all the _crap_ I recieve
from their routers.
Neil J. McRae. Alive and Kicking. Domino: In the glow of the night.
neil@DOMINO.ORG NetBSD/sparc: 100% SpF (Solaris protection Factor)
Free the daemon in your <A HREF="http://www.NetBSD.ORG/">computer!</A>
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -