North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: Keepalives, WAS: NAP/ISP Saturation
- From: William Allen Simpson
- Date: Sun Dec 22 22:28:17 1996
> From: Vadim Antonov <email@example.com>
> William Allen Simpson <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> >So, since we designed PPP LQM for the 56K, T1 and (new) T3s of 5-6
> >years ago (at least a generation in Internet lifetimes), why isn't
> >everyone already running it?
> Because Morning Star is not cisco? (I'm well aware of PPP features,
> btw, having written one implementation myself :)
I do not understand this rationale. Could you please elaborate?
Are you saying that the reason we are not using ubiquitous LQM is
because Cisco decided as a company policy not to interoperate with other
BTW, I have never worked for Morning Star in any paid capacity; or I'd
be a millionare today :-). I just have an email address there, as I do
at several other sites, both commercial and non-commercial.
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
Key fingerprint = 2E 07 23 03 C5 62 70 D3 59 B1 4F 5E 1D C2 C1 A2
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -