North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: Ping flooding
- From: Vern Paxson
- Date: Fri Jul 12 01:05:30 1996
> Really, consider a link where the path carrying most of the data has
> a time of N and the path carrying the ack has a path 2N or N + 1/2N
> You are computing an average which seems like it could be skewed based
> on the path the ack takes.
This doesn't matter. The key notions for TCP are (1) what's the time scale
for feedback, and (2) what's the pipe size (= bandwidth-delay product).
Both of these are determined by the RTT and not the one-way prop time.
> Does anyone know of any papers on the effect of asymetric paths on TCP
Well, I thought about this quite a bit for my end-to-end routing study
(ftp://ftp.ee.lbl.gov/papers/routing.SIGCOMM.ps.Z). I really wanted to
come up with some reason why asymmetric routing has serious implications
for TCP performance, but wasn't able to. I guess this is a good thing,
since 50% of the paths in my study were asymmetric in terms of visiting
at least one different city in the two directions. 30% visited at least
one different AS.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -