North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: misinformation and rumors from MCI
- From: mike
- Date: Wed Jan 31 10:33:56 1996
Don't worry: I heard the exactly same story: an MCI sales 'pro' from
around here tells customers, IDT is a second line provider and not at any
Just sales guys who want a comission (rendering a bad service to their
company, however). No problems with MCI for sure. Bet they would like to
which sales guy you talked to
On Tue, 30 Jan 1996, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
> Here's a piece of mail I just got forwarded to me by a customer, originally
> written by someone at "worlds.net". I wonder who at MCI is so incredibly
> misinformed about small ISPs, to the point of denigrating them?
> >I met with the regional direction for networkMCI services last week.
> >One of the issues discussed was scruz-net.
> >They are not a true Mae-west peer, meaning their only connection to
> >the internet is through the Mae-west FDDI ring. Even worse, the only
> >company who has agreed to peer with them (accept any traffic) is MCI.
> >Thus, all scruz net traffic must enter and exit through the MCI
> >router, even if bound for another peer on the ring such as Sprint or
> >This was a mistake created by a single person at the internic, who
> >didn't realize fully the ramification of having a non-nationwide
> >network peering into mae-west. (all other peers at the mae's and
> >nap's touch each other at multiple cross-over points)
> For the curious, our 7505 at MAE-West peers with 15 other NSPs/ISPs who
> are there, and since we don't buy transit from MCI the _only_ traffic that
> enters the MCI router is traffic for their customers. Anybody at MCI
> who is interested in educating their "regional directors" about how the
> technology actually works might want to do so soon.
> -matthew kaufman
Michael F. Nittmann ---------
Senior Network Architect \ /
(201) 928 4456 -------
(201) 928 1888 FAX \ /