North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: CIDR Aggregation Tool
- From: Avi Freedman
- Date: Mon Nov 27 13:51:44 1995
[Please take any other responses just to cidrd. This is copied to big-inet
and nanog so people will see the followup request. I just wanted the
announcement to go out maximally, but the details and responses are of
no interet to nanog as a whole...]
> > Our route table has:
> > *> 18.104.22.168 22.214.171.124 <--- agis
> > *> 126.96.36.199/22 188.8.131.52 <--- mci
> > *> 184.108.40.206 220.127.116.11 <--- agis
> > *> 18.104.22.168 22.214.171.124 <--- agis
> This isn't what agis is supposed to be announcing, I'll have to
> ask them again to announce 198.111.252/22. There's a couple less
> routes already :-).
> Once that is fixed, further aggregation of 126.96.36.199 (say into
> 198.111/16, as a non real example) would change our routing (in
> ways we don't want it changed), even with your "next hop the same"
> criteria because of the additional meaning that specifics have in
> terms of priority.
Well, we only see 198.111.252, 253, and 255 from AGIS, so there's no
danger of AGIS over-aggregating even if they combined 252 & 253...
> I agree that your tool is usefull in identifying _potential_ savings.
That's all it's for.