Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

Network Security

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical FW: Security Wire Perspectives, Vol. 6, No. 22, March 18, 2004

  • From: Howell, Paul
  • Date: Thu Mar 18 06:54:27 2004


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Security Wire Perspectives 
> [mailto:searchSecurity@lists.techtarget.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 4:01 AM
> To: Security Wire Perspectives
> Subject: Security Wire Perspectives, Vol. 6, No. 22, March 18, 2004
> 
> 
> Security Wire Perspectives is published by Information 
> Security, the industry's leading magazine for security news 
> and information, and SearchSecurity.com, the Web's best 
> security-specific information resource for enterprise IT 
> professionals. Additional newsletters available at 
> http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/?track=NL-358&ad=478466&O
> ffer=swp .
> 
> IN THIS ISSUE:
> 
> A READ ON THE NEWS
> *Beware of Hotel Hacking 
> *Microsoft to Duplicate Third-Party Security Apps in Longhorn 
> 
> HEADLINES
> *Report: Zero-Day Exploits Nearing
> *New Platform Takes Remote Control
> *All-in-one Security Devices Carry Their Weight
> *How Privacy Costs Impact Infrastructure 
> *Security Issues Delay Yukon
> *'Threat Fatigue' an Ever-present Danger for IT
> 
> WEEKLY SECURITY PLANNER
> Week 14: Malicious Code -- When Viruses and Worms Run Amok
> 
> WHATIS WORD OF THE WEEK
> *Freeware
> 
> YOUR TWO CENTS
> Readers sound off on the dangers of .zip files
> 
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, REFER TO THE INSTRUCTIONS AT THE END OF THIS MESSAGE
> 
> =====================================================
> 
> SECURITY WIRE PERSPECTIVES IS SPONSORED BY: CipherTrust 
> 
> WHITE PAPER: Selecting an Email Security Solution
> 
> Spam, viruses, phishing, and other attacks have become 
> Routine. Organizations now require a comprehensive approach 
> to securing their email systems. In this white paper from 
> Spire Security, analyst Pete Lindstrom defines and discusses 
> the risks associated with email. He identifies key 
> requirements in four areas - identity, trust, threat, and 
> vulnerability management - for choosing an email security 
> solution. Finally, the paper identifies ways to gain a return 
> on investment with an email security solution. Request your 
> white paper
> at: 
> http://searchSecurity.com/r/0,,26459,00.htm?track=NL-358&ad=47
> 8466&ciphertrust
> 
> =====================================================
> 
> A READ ON THE NEWS
> 
> *BEWARE OF HOTEL HACKING
> By Anne Saita
> 
> When traveling with a laptop, it can be difficult to 
> determine if a hotel network provider's level of security 
> matches your enterprise's requirements. And that matters 
> whether you're working out of a lobby, guest room or on a 
> convention floor.
> 
> Salt Lake City-based STSN, which provides network security to 
> some 900 hotels nationwide and handles a half-million guest 
> room connections a month, plans to offer freeware to help 
> business travelers gauge a hotel-based Internet service's security.
> 
> The simple application runs from any laptop and, once plugged 
> into a hotel port, scans a network for vulnerabilities. It 
> recommends whether the user should continue, be cautious or 
> reconsider using the service.
> 
> Though a corporate VPN provides plenty of security, STSN CTO 
> Brett Molen cautions that many machines' OSes are still 
> vulnerable. "When someone gives you a public IP address in a 
> hotel room, at that point you are completely open. There may 
> not be firewall protection and, in Microsoft's OSes, 
> file-sharing is on by default -- and that provides 
> opportunities for attackers, too."
> 
> Molen recommends the following for business travelers:
> --Find out a hotel's ISP and what security is included with 
> the service. --Turn off file sharing. --Run a personal 
> firewall. --Test your VPN against the hotel's network for 
> compatibility.
> 
> These tips should help keep hackers from accessing your hard 
> drive. "And let's face it, the good stuff is on the hard 
> drive," Molen says.
> 
> 
> *MICROSOFT TO DUPLICATE THIRD-PARTY SECURITY APPS IN LONGHORN 
> By Edmund X. DeJesus
> 
> Microsoft's next operating system -- code-named Longhorn -- 
> will contain some security features that third-party software 
> vendors currently provide. These built-in features will make 
> it tough for administrators to decide whether to buy the 
> extra software or simply rely on Windows alone.
> 
> Longhorn, the successor to Windows XP, is expected to ship in 
> 2006, about two years behind schedule. Alpha versions of the 
> operating system were distributed to developers in October 
> 2003, and that special build is available to subscribers of 
> the Microsoft development network.
> 
> One aspect of Longhorn security is the Next-Generation Secure 
> Computing Base (NGSCB) initiative, formerly known as Palladium. 
> 
> "NGSCB will employ a unique hardware and software design to 
> give people new kinds of security protections," explains 
> Mario Juarez, product manager with the security business and 
> technology unit at Microsoft. 
> 
> The idea is to move some of the security burden from software 
> to a Trusted Platform Model (TPM) chip, which will perform 
> cryptographic functions that include storing digital keys and 
> hashes to verify the authenticity of data. A new software 
> component called a nexus will support two separate operating 
> modes for Windows. In standard mode, Windows will function as 
> usual and users would run applications without any special 
> handling. In nexus mode, application processes will run in 
> separate memory areas that the nexus would reserve, 
> presumably keeping them out of harm's way. 
> 
> However, it's the other new security initiatives that may be 
> bad news for security software vendors. At the February RSA 
> Conference, Microsoft chairman and chief software architect 
> Bill Gates revealed several new features intended to 
> automatically monitor system and network behavior and respond 
> to possible threats. Similar to several existing security 
> products, Windows would attempt to identify irregular 
> behavior in system calls, memory usage and network traffic.
> 
> Part of this initiative -- called active protection 
> technologies -- acts as behavior-based antivirus software 
> products do. The approach tries to protect the system from 
> malicious software by detecting known behaviors, then halting 
> and containing the offending software. 
> 
> "Microsoft is developing security technology that will 
> proactively adjust computer defenses based on state changes, 
> contain the impact and spread of worms and viruses, and 
> prevent known attacks from compromising the system," said Jon 
> Murchinson, product manager at Microsoft's security business 
> and technology unit.
> 
> Dynamic system protection, another initiative component, 
> essentially will be an intrusion detection and protection 
> feature. It will keep track of the security patches applied 
> to the system for known problems, and make appropriate 
> changes to the Windows firewall to protect the system from 
> attacks that might take advantage of any missing patches. 
> This feature would also change security settings based on the 
> type of network connection used, reacting to the difference 
> between a corporate network and a dial-up connection. 
> 
> "Dynamic system protection proactively adjusts defenses on 
> each computer based on changes in state, reducing the 
> likelihood of a successful attack," said Murchinson.
> 
> This isn't the first time that Microsoft has incorporated 
> features from third-party software into its operating 
> systems. Disk defragmentation, file undelete, compression and 
> antivirus all started out as third-party products before 
> Microsoft duplicated them. Security products appear to be next.
> 
> =====================================================
> 
> HEADLINES
> A look at other significant industry happenings from our 
> sister publication, Security Wire Daily
> 
> *Report: Zero-Day Exploits Nearing
> SearchSecurity.com
> The time is coming when zero-day threats will become a 
> reality, according to Symantec Corp.'s recently released 
> Internet Security Threat Report. 
> http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,
> sid14_gci930180,00.html?track=NL-358&ad=478466
> 
> 
> *New Platform Takes Remote Control
> SearchSecurity.com
> A Texas company has devised software to disable cameras on 
> cellphones at enterprises discouraging their use. 
> http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,
> sid14_gci955312,00.html?track=NL-358&ad=478466
> 
> 
> *All-in-one Security Devices Carry Their Weight 
> SearchNetworking.com All-in-one security devices are making 
> it easier to keep distributed networks safe, and it's no 
> wonder competition in the space is heating up. Despite 
> earlier misgivings, one international firm explains how it's 
> using a product from ServGate to deploy security updates. 
> http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/newsItem/0,289139,sid14_g
> ci955311,00.html?track=NL-358&ad=478466
> 
> 
> *How Privacy Costs Impact Infrastructure
> SearchSecurity.com
> A new survey indicates companies with IT safeguards over 
> individual data still have poor privacy policies and business 
> practices that undermine that technology. 
> http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,
> sid14_gci955081,00.html?track=NL-358&ad=478466 
> 
> 
> *Security Issues Delay Yukon
> SearchDatabase.com
> Security concerns are among the most obvious reasons for the 
> Yukon delay, but analysts say that a larger problem looms 
> just beneath the surface. 
> http://searchdatabase.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,
> sid13_gci954886,00.html?track=NL-358&ad=478466
> 
> 
> *'Threat Fatigue' an Ever-present Danger for IT 
> SearchWin2000.com Software vulnerability ratings have a lot 
> in common with terror threat levels. If the level rises too 
> high too often, "threat fatigue" sets in. And the 
> consequences can be disastrous if people become complacent. 
> http://searchwin2000.techtarget.com/columnItem/0,294698,sid1_g
> ci954860,00.html?track=NL-358&ad=478466
> 
> =====================================================
> 
> *ADVERTISEMENT*
> 
> Time's running out to apply to Information Security Decisions 
> coming to NYC April 19-21. Join a senior-level audience of 
> your peers for unprecedented technical content and the best 
> 3-day investment you'll spend out of the office this year. 
> Gain expert insight you can't find anywhere else at any 
> price. Apply today: 
> http://infosecurityconference.techtarget.com/?track=NL-358&ad=
> 478466&Offer=isdad
> 
> =====================================================
> 
> WEEKLY SECURITY PLANNER
> 
> In an effort to help busy security managers, CISSP Shelley 
> Bard's weekly column will build upon the concept of the 
> perpetual calendar ( 
> http://www.searchSecurity.com/tip/1,289483,sid14_gci948651,00.
> html?track=NL-358&ad=478466 ), offering a schedule of 
> reminders for a proactive, strategic security plan. For an 
> archive of previous columns, please visit: 
> http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/tipsIndex/0,289482,sid14_
> tax295570_alpD_idx0,00.html?track=NL-358&ad=478466
> 
> Week 14: Malicious Code -- When Viruses and Worms Run Amok
> 
> WHEN: Update weekly; at least daily during outbreaks
> 
> WHY: Even though it seems logical to believe that everyone 
> should have some protection on their systems by now, Netsky 
> and Mydoom wouldn't have infected so many computers if this 
> were so. The bottom line is that if you've had loss of 
> business, bandwidth clogging, productivity erosion, 
> management time reallocation issues or recovery costs, you 
> were affected.
> 
> STRATEGY: A virus is a program capable of replicating with 
> little or no user intervention, that can destroy other 
> programs without your permission. A worm is a 
> self-replicating piece of code that spreads to other drives, 
> systems or networks. I roll my eyes when I hear people 
> correcting others when discussing a "worm" or a "virus." 
> Other terms like trapdoor, time bomb, etc., are just flavors. 
> Who cares? They're all code you don't want on your systems. 
> Stop correcting people, and correct the system problems. 
> Viruses generally have a harder time running on Unix systems. 
> There are a few viruses that run on Linux. Windows suffers 
> the majority. 
> 
> Figure out where the problem occurred. Virus signature 
> updates not current or not frequent enough? Ensure you have 
> the latest signatures the minute they're available, for 
> example, using an auto-update mechanism versus fetching them 
> yourself. People executing those attached files? Perhaps you 
> need a better/faster/louder alert system for users. (Add this 
> item to your training, education and awareness
> program.) E-mail server not recognizing outgoing spam? Tweak 
> the activity threshold or get a third party package that 
> regulates bulk e-mails, in or out. If your company does a lot 
> of legitimate mass e-mailing, you'll have to tweak this 
> system more than most. Users complaining about e-mail 
> quarantines? Tough. Better a few late e-mail files than a 
> system down and organization compromised. Use a backup system 
> called the "telephone." 
> 
> In sum, take the time to figure out the area of your system 
> most vulnerable to viruses and fix it. Even if there is a 
> "next time," the fallout will affect you less, the fix will 
> be faster and more manageable overall.
> 
> MORE INFORMATION: Fred Cohen, generally credited with 
> creating the first virus, got the idea for the term from a 
> science fiction book, Shockwave Rider (Harper and Row, 1975), 
> where the author discussed a computer tapeworm. Virus 
> protection tools are available from Computer Associates, 
> F-Secure, Kaspersky Labs, McAfee, Sophos, Symantec and Trend 
> Micro. Some of these companies also offer AV for Unix-based 
> systems. All can help you find what you need to make your 
> system more secure.
> 
> SHELLEY BARD, CISSP, is a senior security network engineer 
> with Verizon Federal Network Systems (FNS). An infosecurity 
> professional for 17 years, Bard has briefed and written 
> infosecurity assessments and technical reports for the White 
> House and Department of Defense, special interest groups, 
> industry and academia. Please e-mail any comments to 
> mailto:securityplanner@infosecuritymag.com
> 
> Opinions expressed in this column are those of Shelley Bard 
> and don't necessarily reflect those of Verizon FNS.
> 
> NEXT WEEK: Spring cleaning -- part 1
> 
> =====================================================
> 
> Information Security Spam Survey
> 
> Spam is a menace to enterprises and individual e-mail users. 
> Tell Information Security magazine how spam is affecting your 
> company by taking our spam survey: 
> http://www.insightexpress.com/s/Spam69230.
> 
> The survey takes just a few minutes. Participants will remain 
> anonymous.
> 
> =====================================================
> 
> WHATIS WORD OF THE WEEK: Freeware  
> 
> Freeware (not to be confused with free software) is 
> programming that is offered at no cost and is a common class 
> of small applications available for downloading and use in 
> most operating systems. Because it may be copyrighted, you 
> may or may not be able to reuse it in programming you are 
> developing. The least restrictive "no-cost" programs are 
> uncopyrighted programs that are in the public domain. When 
> reusing public domain software in your own programs, it's 
> good to know the history of the program so that you can be 
> sure it really is in the public domain. 
> 
> Free software, a somewhat newer and unrelated concept, is 
> software that can be freely used, modified, and redistributed 
> with only one
> restriction: any redistributed version of the software must 
> be distributed with the original terms of free use, 
> modification, and distribution (known as copyleft). The 
> definition of free software is stipulated as part of the GNU 
> project and by the Free Software Foundation. Unlike freeware, 
> free software may be distributed for a fee. Freeware is 
> liable to be more limited in capability than free software. 
> 
> Other security definitions: 
> http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/glossary/0,294242,sid14,0
> 0.html?track=NL-358&ad=478466
> 
> =====================================================
> 
> YOUR TWO CENTS
> Readers sound off
> 
> Q&A: Dangers of ZIP Files 
> http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/qna/0,289202,sid14_gci953
> 548,00.html?track=NL-358&ad=478466
> 
> The article on the dangers of .zip files is interesting but I 
> do have a few comments.
> 
> Most companies won't hold all .zip files; to check the 
> content will take too much time. They'll either block them or 
> let them through so they can be scanned. 
> 
> All antivirus scanners can scan the contents of .zip files. 
> If the content is password-protected, then the content should 
> be checked. If you stop .zip files, .exe files should be 
> stopped, as well as .rar files, which are also quite common 
> and I'm not sure if all AV vendors can handle that format. 
> The last place I worked let the scanners handle .zip and .exe 
> files. Maybe .msi files should be blocked? I'm not sure if 
> any exist but why stop at .zip and .exe files? How about .z 
> files (Unix)? --Ed Braiter
> 
> 
> I read the interview with Bruce Hughes with interest. I would 
> like to comment on the following part of the dialog:
> 
> SWP: Is stripping .zip files at the gateway the best way to 
> mitigate these threats? Are there less severe measures?
> 
> HUGHES: A default-deny approach at the gateway is the best 
> approach, permitting only file types that are needed to do 
> business. Always block attachments that are unsafe, i.e. 
> .exe, .scr, .pif, .vbs, .zip, etc. 
> 
> I'd like to suggest a metaphor. Let's imagine an imaginary 
> police state, where there is a checkpoint on the onramp and 
> everyone is checked for blood alcohol concentration and drunk 
> drivers are taken off the road. What Hughes suggests is that, 
> regardless of passengers, we will automatically ban all buses 
> from going on the highway.
> 
> I believe that most (if not all) businesses have legitimate 
> uses for .zip files. Windows XP incorporates a zip engine 
> integrated with the shell. Antivirus engines check .zip files 
> constantly for virus-infected content. If we are to filter 
> dangerous files, why filter .zip, rather than dangerous files 
> WITHIN the .zip files?
> 
> My point is that .zip is a harmless container. The files 
> within that container need to be filtered, and not the 
> container itself. If the container is filtered, the many 
> business uses that the .zip format enables are eliminated 
> along with the risk. --Arik Baratz, system engineer, Vidius Israel 
> 
> :::::::::::::::::::::  ABOUT THIS NEWSLETTER  ::::::::::::::::::::::
> 
> Security Wire Perspectives (BPA E-Mail Audit Report, June 
> 2002*) is an e-mail newsletter brought to you on Mondays and 
> Thursdays by Information Security magazine, a TechTarget 
> publication. Copyright
> (c) 2004, Information Security and TechTarget. No reuse or 
> redistribution without the express written authorization of 
> Information Security and TechTarget.
>  
> Permission requests, questions or comments should be e-mailed 
> to Shawna McAlearney, online editor, 
> mailto:smcalearney@infosecuritymag.com.
>  
> *A copy of the BPA 
> Audit is available for download at: 
> http://www.bpai.com/library/statement_files/s3> 43h0j2.pdf
>  
> 
> 
> _____________________________________________________________________
> 
> To unsubscribe from "Security Wire Perspectives":
>  
> Go to unsubscribe: 
> http://SearchSecurity.com/u?cid=478466&lid=559334&track=NL-358
&ad=478466
 
Please note, unsubscribe requests may take up to 24 hours to process; you
may receive additional mailings during that time. A confirmation e-mail will
be sent when your request has been successfully processed.
 
Contact us:
SearchSecurity
Member Services
117 Kendrick Street, Suite 800
Needham, MA 02494

------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from netsec, send mail to majordomo@merit.edu
with a body consisting of the words "unsubscribe netsec" --
without the quotes. For more help, send a message to majordomo@merit.edu
with the word "help" as the body.
------------------------------------------------------------------------





Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.