Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

Network Security

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical NSI's Webjacking Epidemic

  • From: Paul Howell
  • Date: Thu Jun 08 06:59:29 2000

At http://wired.com/news/business/0,1367,36797,00.html

NSI's Webjacking Epidemic 
by Craig Bicknell 

3:00 a.m. Jun. 8, 2000 PDT 
Alan Meckler runs a $500 million public Net media
company whose value rests in good part on its
eponymous Web address -- Internet.com. 

Thirteen-hundred other domains help flesh out Meckler's
media empire, which delivers news and information to
seasoned Web vets. 

Last weekend, a thief armed with nothing more than a
fax machine and a piece of paper made off with the
whole enterprise. 

"It appears some forged documents were sent via fax
to Network Solutions indicating that the domains should
be transferred to someone in Canada," Meckler said. 

Much to Meckler's chagrin, Network Solutions promptly
made the transfer. "There was no double-checking on
the part of Network Solutions," he said. "What kind of
business would fax in a letter saying, 'Just turn over
these 1,300 domains?'" 

After several days of wrangling with Network Solutions
and Open SRS -- the Canadian registrar to which the
stolen domains were transferred -- Meckler has his
domains back, but not his confidence in Network
Solutions. 

"It's resolved until it happens again to us or someone
else," he said. "There's no safeguard. 

"Who would think that property you've paid for, you'd
have to double-check?" Meckler asked. "There's a
definite flaw in the system." 

Not to worry, says Network Solutions: It's a flaw that's
being fixed. 

"We're taking steps to ensure that this type of thing
doesn't happen again," said Network Solutions
spokesman Brian O'Shaughnessy. 

O'Shaughnessy said he couldn't specify what steps
were being taken without comprising their effectiveness
in preventing further domain heists. 

Net entrepreneur Gary Kremen might be forgiven for
failing to take much comfort in the registrar's
assurances. 

A domain he owned, Sex.com, was allegedly stolen by
an ex-felon who, just like the Internet.com booster,
forged a phony transfer document to Network Solutions
more than four years ago. 

"It's outrageous," Kremen said of the Internet.com
heist. "It's exactly what happened to me. This is the
exact thing! Can you imagine?" 

Unlike Meckler, Kremen never got the Sex.com domain
back, though he hopes to recover it following a pending
lawsuit. 

Meanwhile, Web Networks, a nonprofit ISP that hosts
websites for other nonprofits, is still assessing the
damage after losing its domain, Web.net, to a thief last
week. 

In the Web.net heist, the thief forged an email to
Network Solutions authorizing the transfer to Open
SRS. 

Web.net executive director Tonya Hancherow spent a
week battling Network Solutions reps before she
regained control of the site. In the interim, more than
3,500 of her customers went without email and other
Net services. 
"It was like banging my head against a brick wall," she
said. "Not a single person ever returned my phone calls.
They'd disappear into the black hole of business
affairs." 

Only by working with Open SRS was Hancherow able to
wrest control of Web.net back from the webjacker, she
said. 

Network Solutions downplays the webjacking incidents
as a rare -- albeit unfortunate -- side effect of
handling 30,000 domain requests per day. While a
number of sites have been hijacked in preceding
months, the number is "minuscule" when compared to
the total number of domain transactions. 

"Overall, the system is very efficient," O'Shaughnessy
said. 

It's also very, very easy to trick, claim Meckler and
Hancherow, both of whom are mulling legal action
against Network Solutions. 

Unlike Hancherow, Meckler said Network Solutions had
been helpful in resolving the hijacking, but hadn't
admitted any negligence or fault. 

Both say Network Solutions ignored its own security
procedures when it transferred Web.net and
Internet.com without receiving password authorization
from the rightful owners. 

"That would be a big deal if we got ourselves organized
to pursue legal action," Hancherow said. 

Attorneys, however, say that legal action against NSI
is likely to lead to a dead end. NSI recently prevailed in
a suit brought against by Kremen in the Sex.com case,
and lawyers expect the same outcome in future
webjacking cases. 

"Network Solutions is insulated from these kinds of
claims," said Connie Ellerbach, a partner with Fenwick
and West in Palo Alto, California. "If they've taken
reasonable steps to prevent this sort of thing, the
court is not going to hold them responsible." 

Meckler is unfazed by the legal precedent. 

"Anyone who knows me knows I take people off at the
knees. If I have to, I'll go to court," he said. "If I go
down, they'll go down." 






Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.