
|
Network Neutrality
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Democrats revive another Net neutrality proposal
- From: Brian Warkoczeski
- Date: Thu May 08 16:43:43 2008
Democrats revive another Net neutrality proposal
By Anne Broache, www.cnet.com
May 8, 2008
The only Net neutrality proposal to encounter some measure of success in
the U.S. Congress is back again for another try.
As foreshadowed at a March hearing, House Judiciary Committee Chairman
John Conyers (D-Mich.) on Thursday reintroduced the Internet Freedom and
Non-discrimination Act, which passed by a 20-13 vote in the same
committee in 2006. Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) is co-sponsoring the
bill, but so far, it is not clear whether any Republicans have signed on.
Just like last time, the bill would rewrite U.S. antitrust law to
prohibit network operators like AT&T and Comcast from blocking,
impairing, or discriminating against "lawful" Internet content,
applications, and services or charging extra fees for "prioritization or
enhanced quality of service."
"The Internet was designed without centralized control, without
gatekeepers for content and services," Conyers said in a statement. "If
we allow companies with monopoly or duopoly power to control how the
Internet operates, network providers could have the power to choose what
content is available."
The five-page measure would provide exceptions for things like
"reasonable and nondiscriminatory" network management necessary to keep
the network running smoothly and compliance with other laws and court
orders.
The bill's introduction comes on the heels of a hearing earlier this
week about a Net neutrality proposal in a competing House panel, the
Energy and Commerce Committee, which traditionally engaged in turf
battles with the Judiciary Committee over certain matters.
Net neutrality, of course, is the idea that network operators shouldn't
be allowed to prioritize information that rides on their pipes.
Advocates of legislation--including Google, Amazon.com, eBay, and a
variety of consumer advocacy groups--argue rules are necessary to keep
the Internet free, open, and democratic, so that small start-ups can be
on a level playing field with more established companies. Network
operators, by contrast, say new rules will stifle investments in new
broadband networks and deprive them of the flexibility they need to keep
their services running smoothly.
|
|
|